Category Archives: News

Thomas J. Herlihy Jr. – former State Senator (R-8) Obituary

Thomas J. Herlihy Jr.

Obituary Condolences

Thomas J. Herlihy Jr. Obituary

Thomas J. Herlihy Jr. was born in Queens, New York and lived his life in Simsbury, Connecticut. Tom attended Saint Mary’s elementary school before graduating from Simsbury High School in 1974. Tom later graduated from the University of Hartford in 1978 with a B.A. in Elementary Education. After teaching in the Simsbury Public School system for two years, he worked at the Traveler’s Insurance Company before opening his own insurance business in 1983. Tom was the owner of T.J. Herlihy Insurance in Simsbury, Connecticut since 1983. In addition to being a local sports enthusiast, Tom was an active participant in Simsbury town politics. He coached his son and daughters in basketball, soccer, and baseball, and watched them grow and thrive in the Simsbury public school system. Tom was also an active member of the Simsbury Rotary Club and served on the Simsbury Board of Selectman from 1987-1990 and then again in 2009. He was elected to the Simsbury Board of Finance in 1991 and served as chairman in 1996. Over the years, Tom was a generous contributor to the Simsbury community. Tom’s passion for public policy eventually led him to serve as a State Representative for the 16th district between 1997 and 1999. He later served as a State Senator for the 8th district between 1999 and 2009. As a State Senator, Tom served on the finance and energy committees and was instrumental in the passage of several lasting reforms. He was honored by the CT State Firefighters Association for spearheading efforts to provide thermal imaging equipment for fire departments throughout the state. Pre- deceased by his father, Thomas Joseph Herlihy Sr., Tom is survived by his mother, Mary Herlihy of Simsbury, and his siblings: Patricia Silva of Suffield, Connecticut; Lynn and Kenneth Tilley of North Andover, Massachusetts; Doreen and Jim Cheverie of North Andover, Massachusetts; James and Kathleen Herlihy of Wallingford, Connecticut; and several nieces and nephews. He is also survived by his daughter Kaitlin Cambras and her husband Jonathan of South Orange, New Jersey, his daughter Meggie Barrow and her husband Jeff of Chicago, Illinois, his son Sean Herlihy of Los Angeles, California, and his former wife Janet Herlihy Russell of West Hartford, Connecticut. Calling hours will be held on Wednesday May 13th from 4:00 p.m. until 7:00 p.m. at the Vincent Funeral Home in Simsbury, Connecticut. A private funeral service will be held. In lieu of flowers, friends may choose to make a donation to Simsbury Youth Soccer LLC. A donation page will be set up at www.simsburysoccer.org. Additionally, you can mail a donation to: Simsbury Soccer Club, P.O. Box 731 Simsbury, CT 06070. Please visit Tom’s “Book of Memories” at www.vincentfuneralhome.com for online condolences.

Published in The Hartford Courant on May 10, 2015

– See more at: http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/hartfordcourant/obituary.aspx?n=thomas-j-herlihy&pid=174826346&#sthash.3rptnDcR.dpuf

Boards of Education will no longer be allowed to use AlertNow

New State Law prohibits Use of “AlertNow” and Other Automated Notification Systems to Communicate the Date, Time and Location of Pending Referenda

As of July 1, 2013 Boards of Education will no longer be allowed to use their AlertNow, e-mail, texting or other automated notification systems to notify parents or guardians of the time, date and location of budget referenda.

The new law was part of the “implementer” statute signed by Governor Malloy on June 19, 2013. Specifically, as of July 1, 2013,

“[n]o person shall use or authorize the use of municipal funds to send an unsolicited communication to a group of residents regarding a referendum via electronic mail, text or telephone or other electronic or automated means for the purpose of reminding or encouraging such residents to vote in a referendum, provided such prohibition shall not apply to a regularly published newsletter or similar publication.”[1]

This new prohibition effectively resolves an open issue that has been raised in more than one town recently about whether sending notice of the time, date and place via AlertNow to a “target audience” of parents and guardians violates Connecticut General Statutes Section 9-369b.

Connecticut General Statutes Section 9-369b forbids the expenditure of public funds to influence any person to vote for or against any referendum question. This law is enforced by the State Election Enforcement Commission (“SEEC”).

When a referendum is officially pending, school districts are prevented from using their resources (computers, paper, copiers, public address systems, etc.) to publish or distribute materials advocating a position on the referendum. In a number of decisions, the SEEC has previously determined that school districts could use automated, “Robo call” systems (AlertNow, e.g.) to give parents a notice of the date, time and place of referenda.[2] Now, as a result of this new law, an electronic or automated communication to a target audience of the time, date and place of a referendum – or even just a reminder to vote – is no longer permissible.

 

Republican American LTE: REGION 7 BUDGET LOADED WITH BLOAT AND HIDDEN COSTS

This letter to the editor was published in the Republican American on April 24th, 2015 by Barkhamsted’s Tom Palmer. A Riverton resident, Palmer, spent a great deal of time researching the facts and details behind this long-established budget process presented by the Region 7 Board of Education.  His findings have the support of neighboring New Hartford town representatives and much of Colebrook’s who will be voting ‘no’ at the upcoming referendum in NW7 towns, where the NW7 BOE asks to pass this as written, despite Palmer and New Hartford reps who asked the BOE and others to revise this budget in recent meetings due to the apparent discrepancies . What Tom discovered can be read below which is how Mr. Palmer’s letter appeared in this established newspaper: 

REGION 7 BUDGET LOADED WITH BLOAT AND HIDDEN COSTS

While taxpayers struggle to make ends meet and towns struggle to keep budgets lean, the Region 7 Board of Education continues a financial strategy to hide historical spending trends and propose another inflated budget.

The last three years alone, it has requested salaries and benefits funding $1.7 million more than what was used for all contractual obligations.

For other purchased services, the board requested $1 million more than was spent: that’s a total of $2.7 million more than was used in three categories.

Much of the artificial “savings” were spent on other areas.

After all spending was accounted for, year-end surpluses averaged $446,000, for a total of $1.3 million overpaid by hardworking taxpayers.

While the board argues the surpluses are eventually credited back to the towns, they never should have been collected first.

The board’s lack of financial transparency stands in sharp contrast to the board’s earned reputation for education excellence. Taxpayers expect a budget reflecting history and what is needed to build Region 7’s education reputation, not an inflated budget without history, which was presented at the April 20 budget hearing.

Only a referendum budget of $19.7 million or less — without the built-in surplus — deserves taxpayer support.

Tom Palmer

Riverton

January Meeting brings High School Republican Club Speaker

Tonight’s first of the year town committee meeting featured a wonderful guest speaker thanks to district eight State Central members Marianne Clark and Richard Tutunjian. This high school student founded her Republican club and has in a short time evolved this into many satellite clubs throughout CT.  In town public schools that don’t allow political clubs, she and her co-chair who is a student in one of these schools, created a Facebook page for young Republicans who want to connect with their peers. Please meet them on an upcoming “Conservative Chat.”

Connecticut General Assembly: The “Plan” by Governor Dannel Malloy

MalloyBHO

 

Written by Juliana Simone

Hartford, CT – The opening of the new legislative session produced two speeches from incumbent Governor Dannel P. Malloy (D). Neither held much promise for the voters of Connecticut who were not among the 26K that put him back in office for a second term. The slight uptick above the less than 1% Malloy won by in 2010, that garnered him around another 1%, perhaps had a lot to do with the democrat majority passing same-day voter registration under his leadership. Long lines were reported in very democrat held cities like New Haven where lines were long, as unregistered voters waited to fill out whatever simple information was needed to go and cast a vote Election Day.

As in 2010, it was the inner city vote that put Malloy, as well as his sitting constitutional officers, back into office. Former challenger Ambassador Tom Foley, running a second time, continued to win the majority of small towns. Foley did not fare as well as he did in 2010, however, and there has been much discussion about the variables that made this so, including his campaign staff and lieutenant governor choice.

In a state whose general assembly has been led by the Democrat party for over twenty years and thrives on votes from state worker and teacher unions, the vote tally for Malloy was overall meager, and illustrated he would not have won a second term without this stronghold.

Proving this, Malloy’s address to the CGA this afternoon, was mostly dedicated to more funding for the Department of Transportation, Connecticut’s largest receiver of state funds. During his first term, the Governor came up with a plan for a busway from New Britain to Hartford, that the Republican caucus, and then the media, referred to as the ‘magic busway’ – in that no one was expected to actually use this method of transportation between the two cities. The transportation line seemingly came to be for funding for the DOT and its workers, even though the building of the line meant carelessly tearing down graves of the buried in New Britain to make room for the lane.

Listening to the address over the radio, it was shocking for many Connecticut residents to hear that his plan was to give more money to the DOT now under his second term. This time, it’s to widen the most used highways in Connecticut to make it easier for workers to get home during their commutes. Malloy and his spokespeople said that when the highways were built originally, no one ever thought the population of Connecticut was going to grow so large. This is why, they explain, the traffic is so congested on key interstates.

Apparently, it has nothing to do with the mere fact that Connecticut sits between NYC and Boston, and the only way to get from one to the other is through what was once the “Constitution State.” Traffic is also heavy with truckers needing to deliver loads to Rhode Island and New Jersey.  Connecticut charges no tolls for those just passing through the state, whether commerce or recreationally related, and this subject is expected to come up once again this new session. Toll booths that used to exist in the state, came down after much discussion over a serious accident that took place at one station in Stratford in 1983.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_Turnpike

One can only imagine the extra time commuters will face as this construction is underway. The usual cones and flag wavers will hold up lines for who knows how long before this grand vision is completed.

The early swearing-in ceremony where Governor Malloy’s wife, Cathy, gave a less than gracious address. Reciting how she had to bite her tongue during the debates pre-election, Mrs. Malloy opined that the Republican candidate had no plan. Anyone who follows politics in this state and outside of it, knows that Tom Foley had a long list of business friendly and pro-growth economy incentives that would have turned our state around for the many here who have seen their savings disappear, have become or remain unemployed, and remain here helplessly overtaxed. In her view, her husband’s plan to give more money to the Department of Transportation and to the public Education System, was preferable and sound.

Mrs. Malloy also seemed to elude to Mr. Foley’s comments during one debate that suggested voters should look at who produced more successful and well-adjusted families for insight into the two candidates. This portion of her speech should have been left out on a celebratory occasion that the Malloy’s should be grateful to have received however small a margin. Readers need to remember that former First Lady of Connecticut, Patricia Rowland, was held under extreme scrutiny for any personal comments she made about any members or challengers from the democrat caucus at public venues.

Former Governor, M. Jodi Rell, made few partisan remarks during her tenure, and this passive yet compliant stance got her little in return from her dominating rivals. The popular former Governor who took over when her predecessor John G. Rowland had to resign, Rell (along with Rowland) is consistently referred to by Malloy and his General Assembly majority, as the reason the state is in such dire straits today – regardless of the fact, as the majority, they controlled all of the votes to pass any budget or legislation, the chairmanship of committees, union leaders and influential lobbyists.

Going into the election, respected publication The National Review, dubbed Governor Malloy as the worst Governor in America. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/389857/americas-worst-governor-matt-purple

The majority of Connecticut voters concurred with this assessment, electing ten new Republican State Representatives to the House, and one new State Senator. Constituents also continue to elect Republicans to head the majority of towns here as Mayors or First Selectmen. It is these voters that understand what the best plan is for their future and their children’s future here in the state of Connecticut.

Governor Malloy should perhaps recognize as he begins his second term, that it is he and his now- lessened majority that should be working with the other side of the aisle, to find the needed answers to make Connecticut less-taxed, as one of the most taxed states in the United States, and prosperous once again, returning jobs to its people and profits to the companies and small businesses that employ them.  If he truly wishes the best for this great state, as he proclaimed today, he will do so.

For full transcript of inauguration speech:

http://www.rep-am.com/news/connecticut/doc54ad8c724beb5976080560.txt

This post can also be read on Ameriborn News: http://ameribornnews.com/2015/01/07/11675/

MalloywithwifeetcJan2015

 

Hartford Courant: Democrats Show Contempt For Election Law

The state Democratic Party blew a truck-sized hole through its increasingly tattered reformist image this week. It did so with a mass mailing whose funding skirts state clean-election laws. The party sent the mailing out over the fierce objections of good-government groups.

The mailing touts Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s re-election. It was paid for with funds from the state party’s federal account — an account meant to help congressional, not state, campaigns and one that is liberally salted with contributions from state contractors.

State law bans state contractors from contributing to state candidates or to the party’s state account — to keep elections clean of their influence.

The party is claiming a loophole in federal law that allows a federal account to be used for get-out-the-vote activities, like mailings, that could — indirectly — benefit candidates at the state level. But this mailing was 99 percent a Malloy ad rather than a get-out-the-vote ad.

The mailing and its timing were brazen and cynical.

The Democrats’ ploy, if successful, will allow special-interest money back into state campaigns and weaken public support for Connecticut’s landmark taxpayer-financed Citizens Election Program.

The State Elections Enforcement Commission has emphatically denounced the Democrats’ mailing as violating the spirit of Connecticut’s election laws.

The state Democratic Party had earlier this month asked for an opinion on the mailing by the Federal Elections Commission, piously saying it wanted to ensure that its Malloy mailing met requirements of the federal law.

 

It then jumped the gun this week, sending out the mailer before the FEC could rule — flipping off both state and federal regulators in the process.

The state Democratic Party is just begging for punishment by regulators and by the voters.

http://www.courant.com/opinion/editorials/hc-ed-democrats-end-run-around-election-law-20141016-story.html